Core-002

核心002

• 批准号: 10613555
• 负责人: JAMES E. HEUBI
• 金额: $ 105.65万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2015
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2015-08-14 至 2025-03-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10613555
• 关键词: Address; Biological Sciences; Clinical Sciences; Collaborations; Communities; Consultations; Development; Discipline; Dissemination and Implementation; Education; Educational workshop; Effectiveness; Face; Funding; Grant; Health; Health Priorities; Healthcare Systems; Infrastructure; Institution; Interdisciplinary Study; Leadership; Learning; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Nature; Outcome; Process; Publishing; Reporting; Research; Research Personnel; Role; Science; Training; Training Programs; Translational Research; Universities; Work; Writing; clinical center; college; community engaged research; community engagement; improved; innovation; knowledge integration; learning community; multidisciplinary; programs; translational pipeline; working group

Engaging stakeholders throughout the full spectrum of the research process leads to better science and, ultimately, better health outcomes. Yet, the 2014 National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Advisory Council Working Group Report found 1) a paucity of community-driven research; and 2) that CTSA hubs lack sufficient infrastructure to support the science of community engagement. The Community Engagement Core (CEC) includes a portfolio of innovative programs and collaborations that demonstrate the benefits of engaging communities as active partners in research to addresses health priorities. We have worked to build capacity in the community-engaged research workforce via training, networking, and grants. Finally, the CEC has consulted with investigators and community stakeholders to optimize research processes and worked with other CCTST Cores and CTSA hubs to facilitate dissemination and implementation of best practices. In the Life Sciences, over 90% of published research is by two or more authors (1). The complexity of the problems studied requires integration of knowledge from many disciplines and the ability to develop and maintain effective teams. The siloed nature of universities and research institutions is partly responsible for challenges investigators face when trying to find collaborators from other disciplines. Our Center for Improvement Science (CIS) has taken a leadership role in developing mechanisms to build broad networks across disciplines, colleges, institutions, and the community. Our initial cross-disciplinary network has resulted in over $6 million in funding for interprofessional research and practice improvement projects. The CIS has also implemented a multi-level team science training program that includes basic to advanced workshops, a graduate-level course on Collaboration and Team Science, and Grand Rounds. In addition, we provide consultations for creating teams, improving teams and writing team-based grants. Finally, our expertise in quality improvement has built bridges between academic and health care systems to form a Learning Health Care System. We will build on our successful track record in community engagement and team science to: Aim 1: Further infuse community engagement within the CCTST and across the translational spectrum; Aim 2: Increase capacity for bi-directional engagement through expansion of educational offerings in community engagement and team science in translational research; Aim 3: Facilitate the development of multidisciplinary Learning Communities (LCs) that support the dissemination and implementation of best practices in community engagement and team science; and Aim 4: Implement an innovative team science program to enhance the effectiveness of multidisciplinary research teams.

让利益相关者参与整个研究过程可以带来更好的科学成果， 最终，获得更好的健康结果。然而，2014 年国家转化科学促进中心 (NCATS) 咨询委员会工作组报告发现 1) 缺乏社区驱动的研究； 2）那 CTSA 中心缺乏足够的基础设施来支持社区参与的科学。社区 参与核心 (CEC) 包括一系列创新计划和合作，展示了 让社区作为积极的合作伙伴参与解决卫生优先事项的研究的好处。我们有 致力于通过培训、网络和资助来建设社区研究队伍的能力。 最后，CEC 与调查人员和社区利益相关者进行了协商，以优化研究流程 并与其他 CCTST 核心和 CTSA 中心合作，促进最佳方案的传播和实施 做法。在生命科学领域，超过 90% 的已发表研究是由两位或更多作者完成的 (1)。复杂性 所研究的问题需要整合许多学科的知识以及开发和解决问题的能力 保持有效的团队。大学和研究机构的孤立性质是造成这种情况的部分原因 研究人员在试图寻找其他学科的合作者时面临的挑战。我们的中心 改进科学（CIS）在制定建立广泛网络的机制方面发挥了领导作用 跨学科、学院、机构和社区。我们最初的跨学科网络已经产生 为跨专业研究和实践改进项目提供超过 600 万美元的资金。独联体有 还实施了多层次的团队科学培训计划，包括基础到高级研讨会、 关于协作和团队科学以及大查房的研究生课程。此外，我们还提供 关于创建团队、改进团队和撰写基于团队的拨款的咨询。最后，我们的专业知识 质量改进在学术和医疗保健系统之间架起了桥梁，形成了学习健康 护理系统。我们将在社区参与和团队科学方面的成功记录的基础上进一步： 目标 1：进一步在 CCTST 和整个转化领域注入社区参与； 目标 2：通过扩大教育服务范围来提高双向参与的能力 转化研究中的社区参与和团队科学； 目标 3：促进多学科学习社区 (LC) 的发展，以支持 传播和实施社区参与和团队科学的最佳实践；和 目标 4：实施创新的团队科学计划，以提高多学科的有效性 研究团队。