Core-002

在整个研究过程中让利益相关者参与进来，会带来更好的科学， 最终，更好的健康结果。然而，2014年国家推进转化科学中心（National Center for Advancing Translational Science） （NCATS）咨询理事会工作组报告发现：1）缺乏社区驱动的研究; 2） CTSA中心缺乏足够的基础设施来支持社区参与的科学。社区 参与核心（CEC）包括一系列创新计划和合作，展示了 让社区作为积极伙伴参与研究以解决卫生优先事项的好处。我们有 通过培训、网络和赠款，努力建设社区参与研究工作的能力。 最后，CEC与调查人员和社区利益相关者进行了磋商，以优化研究过程 并与其他CCTST核心和CTSA中心合作，促进传播和实施最佳 实践在生命科学领域，超过90%的已发表研究是由两个或两个以上的作者完成的。的复杂性 所研究的问题需要从许多学科知识的整合和能力，发展和 保持有效的团队。大学和研究机构的孤立性是造成这一现象的部分原因。 调查人员在试图从其他学科寻找合作者时面临的挑战。我们中心 改进科学（CIS）在发展建立广泛网络的机制方面发挥了领导作用 跨学科，学院，机构和社区。我们最初的跨学科网络 超过600万美元用于跨专业研究和实践改进项目。独联体的 还实施了一个多层次的团队科学培训计划，包括基本到高级研讨会， 研究生水平的协作和团队科学课程，以及大圆桌会议。其他企业我们提供 为创建团队、改进团队和编写基于团队的赠款提供咨询。最后，我们的专业知识， 质量改进在学术和医疗保健系统之间建立了桥梁，形成了学习健康 护理系统。我们将在社区参与和团队科学方面取得成功的基础上： 目标1：在CCTST和整个翻译范围内进一步注入社区参与; 目标2：通过扩大教育服务， 翻译研究中的社区参与和团队科学; 目标3：促进多学科学习社区的发展， 传播和实施社区参与和团队科学方面的最佳做法; 目标4：实施创新的团队科学计划，以提高多学科的有效性 研究团队。

Engaging stakeholders throughout the full spectrum of the research process leads to better science and, ultimately, better health outcomes. Yet, the 2014 National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Advisory Council Working Group Report found 1) a paucity of community-driven research; and 2) that CTSA hubs lack sufficient infrastructure to support the science of community engagement. The Community Engagement Core (CEC) includes a portfolio of innovative programs and collaborations that demonstrate the benefits of engaging communities as active partners in research to addresses health priorities. We have worked to build capacity in the community-engaged research workforce via training, networking, and grants. Finally, the CEC has consulted with investigators and community stakeholders to optimize research processes and worked with other CCTST Cores and CTSA hubs to facilitate dissemination and implementation of best practices. In the Life Sciences, over 90% of published research is by two or more authors (1). The complexity of the problems studied requires integration of knowledge from many disciplines and the ability to develop and maintain effective teams. The siloed nature of universities and research institutions is partly responsible for challenges investigators face when trying to find collaborators from other disciplines. Our Center for Improvement Science (CIS) has taken a leadership role in developing mechanisms to build broad networks across disciplines, colleges, institutions, and the community. Our initial cross-disciplinary network has resulted in over $6 million in funding for interprofessional research and practice improvement projects. The CIS has also implemented a multi-level team science training program that includes basic to advanced workshops, a graduate-level course on Collaboration and Team Science, and Grand Rounds. In addition, we provide consultations for creating teams, improving teams and writing team-based grants. Finally, our expertise in quality improvement has built bridges between academic and health care systems to form a Learning Health Care System. We will build on our successful track record in community engagement and team science to: Aim 1: Further infuse community engagement within the CCTST and across the translational spectrum; Aim 2: Increase capacity for bi-directional engagement through expansion of educational offerings in community engagement and team science in translational research; Aim 3: Facilitate the development of multidisciplinary Learning Communities (LCs) that support the dissemination and implementation of best practices in community engagement and team science; and Aim 4: Implement an innovative team science program to enhance the effectiveness of multidisciplinary research teams.