Engineering Design Process Portfolio Scoring Rubric (EDPPSR)

目前，学生有很多机会参加当地学校和俱乐部，政府实验室和国家组织组织的设计经验。 虽然这些项目可以激发学生对STEM的兴趣，但目前还没有普遍接受的框架来衡量学习和教学，以研究学生在STEM知识和技能方面的增长，或者他们追求STEM的自我效能感和坚持性，或者根据共同的措施来认可他们的成就。本提案的目的，“工程设计过程组合评分规则（EDPPSR）”是为了测试EDPPSR评分系统的有效性，该系统可用于区分基于工程设计的项目领域的绩效水平。该研究的目的是确定在不同的背景下（正式与非正式，低与高风险，高中与大学）和不同的条件下（个人与小组工作，自我发起与分配等）的学生工作的EDPPSR的可靠性和有效性。拟议的研究是一个验证和可靠的评分工具，可用于评估设计为基础的项目，并告知教学实践的规模扩大的关键一步。具体而言，EDPPSR被建议作为未来工程先进安置考试的格式。作为项目组合条目提供的哪些类型的工件可以构成每个ESPPSR元素的熟练程度的证据？2.在不同的上下文和条件下，工件类型可能会有什么不同？3.标题标准是否涉及任何与工程设计过程无关的内容或与结构无关的内容？4.标准是否准确和全面地解决了工程设计过程中的所有要素？一个经过验证和可靠的ESPPSR可能会导致学生获得入学，认可甚至本科生的安置学分，他们的项目为基础的活动，并可能会影响到人才的学生进入STEM管道招聘，并可以通知招聘学生从代表性不足的群体。

Currently there are numerous opportunities for students to participate in design-based experiences organized by local schools and clubs, government laboratories and national organizations. While these programs can inspire students' interest in STEM, there are no commonly accepted frameworks to benchmark learning and instruction in order to study students' growth in STEM knowledge and skills or their self-efficacy and persistence to pursue STEM or to recognize their achievements based on common measures.The purpose of this proposal, "Engineering Design Process Portfolio Scoring Rubric (EDPPSR)" is to test the efficacy of the EDPPSR scoring system that could be applied to differentiate levels of performance in the domain of the engineering design based projects. The intent of the study is to determine the reliability and validity of the EDPPSR across student work produced in diverse contexts (formal versus informal, low versus high stakes, high school versus college) and under different conditions (individual versus group work, self-initiated versus assigned, etc.). The proposed study is a critical step in the scale-up of a validated and reliable scoring tool that could be used to evaluate design-based projects and to inform instructional practice. Specifically, the EDPPSR is proposed as the format for a future engineering advanced placement exam. The research questions which will guide the project are:1. Which types of artifacts provided as portfolio entries may constitute evidence of proficiency in each ESPPSR element?2. How will artifact types be likely to differ within/across diverse contexts and conditions?3. Do the rubric criteria address any content extraneous to the engineering design process or are any irrelevant to the construct?4. Do criteria accurately and fully address all elements of the engineering design process?A validated and reliable ESPPSR could potentially lead to students gaining admission, recognition or even undergraduate placement credit for their project-based activities and could impact the recruitment of talented students into the STEM pipeline and could inform the recruitment of students from under-represented groups.