Development of university lesson improvement method through co-operative work with digital teaching portfolios by two teachers.

本研究的目的是探讨不同组织的两位教师通过合作分析，利用他们的电子教学档案袋(TP)来改进教案的方法。TPS是为了客观评价他们的课程内容而制定的。每个阶段的信息都是在教师之间共享的，从早期的发展阶段开始，就是试验、评估和改进阶段。教师在不同的机构，但在同一个专业。(1)积累了两位教师的电子教学档案，每节课的材料、学生的评价和课后的自我评价都被记录为电子TP。对于新科目，增加了关于内容和学生信息的相互评论日志，并对其进行了分类。电子试卷制作简单易行，帮助教师更精准地提高成绩。然而，我们发现这种方法并不是每年都适用的，因为改进工作使茶叶…分析了教材开发的协同作业过程及其评价学生的方法，从教材的开发、材料的使用和评价学生的方法三个方面分析了两门教师学科的相互评价过程，提出了给学生布置任务的方式和评价方法的不同，并对其进行了评论。教师通过听课更好地理解了各自的授课意图，从而有效地提高了每节课的教学效果；评议报告任务是每个教师以不同的方式完成的，反映的方式也不同。这些教师的反馈被学生作为课堂评价给予很高的评价。学生对报告任务的课堂评价将与主要目标相联系，作为我们未来的任务。今年是对学生的最后一次绩效测试，因为每节课的备课材料和关于课堂评价研究的讨论量在几年后仍然没有减少。这需要时间，所以老师不能把时间花在课堂活动上。复习系统是用选择题的方法开发的，给两个班级布置了相同的任务。这一系统是明确课程内容权重的有用工具，因为它有助于教师看到它们之间的差异。较少

The aim of this research is to develop the method of improving lesson plans between two teachers at different organizations through the co-operative analysis using their electric teaching portfolios (TP). TPs are made for assessing objectively the contents of their lessons. Information on each stage has been shared between teachers from the early developing stage as the trial, the evaluation and the improvement one. The teachers are at different organizations but in the same specialty.(1)Accumulating Electric Teaching Portfolios of two teachers, who are author and the partaker.Every materials, students' evaluation and pre- post self evaluation on each lesson are recorded as Electric TP. As for new subject, logs of mutual comments, which are categorized, on contents and student information are added on it. Electric TP making is simple work and helps teachers more precise improvement. However we found that this method is not applicable for every year as the work for improvement makes tea … More chers' work heavy load.(2)Analysis on the co-operative working process of developing the lesson materials and its method of evaluating students.Mutual evaluation processes are analyzed on material development, material usages and the method of evaluating students of two teachers' subject mattersDifference of the ways to give tasks to students and the evaluation methods of those tasks were brought out and comments were added on them. Teachers' intentions for lessons were mutually understood more through sitting in on a class, which lead to their effective improvement of each lessons.Comments on the report task as mutual evaluating work were accomplished with different methods by each teachers and those reflecting methods were also different. These teachers' feedbacks are evaluated high by students as class evaluation. Students' class evaluation on reporting task will be analyzed to relate with the main goal as our future task.Performance test to students was the last by this year, as the amount of every lesson's preparation for materials and discussion on research of class evaluation has not been decreased even after several years has been passed. This took time so teachers can not use time for class activities.Reviewing system has been developed with multiple choice method and gave the same tasks to both classes. This system can be useful tools for making clear of weights on the lesson contents as it helps teachers to see the difference between them. Less