A Study on Transition Characteristics of Evaluation Factors for Art Education after WWII

二战后艺术教育评价因素变迁特征研究

• 批准号: 17530639
• 负责人: YAMADA Kazumi
• 金额: $ 1.22万
• 依托单位: Tokyo Gakugei University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2005
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2005 至 2006
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-17530639/
• 关键词: Educational Evaluation; Art Education; Evaluation Factor; History of Educational Evaluation; Art in Education; Magazine for Art Education; ability of expression; ability of appreciation; 美術教育評価; 評価観点; 評価規準; 評価史; 評価論; 作品評価; 教育美術; 美育文化

We present a description of diversity, a chain of relationships, evolutions, exchanges, influences, and disconnections between keywords, referring to evaluation factors that art educators, theorists, or commentators have asserted or have written about in two magazines after WWII. We selected articles in monthly magazines, Kyouiku-Bijutsu [Art in Education] and Biiku-Bunka [Magazine for Art Education] and analyzed the keywords of evaluation factors.Nowadays, four terms of the valuation factors are included among permanents school records for Japanese students in art education: 1) Interests/aspirations/attitudes regarding plastic arts, 2) Ability to create/develop ideas and to imagine, 3) Creative skills, and 4) Appreciation of works. However, educators and other experts on bettering children's skills or activities have clarified many of the keywords regarding the valuation factors.The keywords that were selected in the two magazines are good poor-work (picture), good poor-figure, the na … More ture of the child, personality, the ability to pursue themes, the beauty of realism, sensibility, intellect, aesthetic expression, figurative power, expression of the self, the nature of the origin, aesthetic sentiment, function of play, feeling alive, being free, having the power to live, autonomy, ability to recognize space, ideas, the feeling of sympathy, and the ability to manipulate raw materials.In conclusion, keywords and concepts as evaluation factors in Japanese art education were constructed and influenced the following streams.1) Repression release claim and progressive education based on liberalism against school control.2) Modern art movement and the introduction of the concepts into school art.3) The abilities of creation, imagination, and image.4) Approach by educational technology, action research, and cognitive psychology.5) Controversy about school achievements.6) Relationship between the nature of the child and his/her play.These have been crucial issues pertaining to Japanese art education in schools. The problems with the results this research obtained are as follows. Less

我们提出了对多样性的描述，即关键词之间的关系链、演变、交流、影响和脱节，参考二战后艺术教育家、理论家或评论家在两本杂志上断言或撰写的评估因素。我们选取了月刊《Kyouiku-Bijutsu》和《Biiku-Bunka》中的文章，对评估因素的关键词进行了分析。目前，日本学生艺术教育的永久学校记录中包含四个评估因素：1）对造型艺术的兴趣/愿望/态度，2）创造/发展想法和想象的能力，3）创造性技能，4） 作品鉴赏。然而，教育工作者和其他关于提高儿童技能或活动的专家已经澄清了许多有关评价因素的关键词。两本杂志选择的关键词是：好可怜的作品（图画）、好可怜的身材、孩子的天性、个性、追求主题的能力、现实主义之美、感性、智力、审美表达、比喻力量、自我表达、起源本质、审美 情感、游戏的功能、活着的感觉、自由、生存的力量、自主性、空间认知能力、思想、同情心以及操纵原材料的能力。总之，日本艺术教育中作为评价因素的关键词和概念被构建并影响了以下流派。1）基于反对学校控制的自由主义的压抑释放主张和进步教育。2）现代艺术运动和将这些概念引入学校艺术。3） 创造、想象力和图像。4）教育技术、行动研究和认知心理学的方法。5）关于学校成就的争议。6）孩子的天性和他/她的游戏之间的关系。这些一直是日本学校艺术教育的关键问题。本研究所得结果存在以下问题。较少的

项目成果

Some Aspects of Workshop Activity on Formation Program Development : In Case of Musashino Art University's Practical Study

形成计划开发研讨会活动的一些方面：以武藏野美术大学的实践研究为例

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 2006 Fall International Design Conference, Proceedings, The Korean Society of Design Culture
• 作者: Hideaki OTOMO;et. al.;大友秀明(他);Hideaki OTOMO;宮澤 好春・大友 秀明・桐谷 正信;大友秀明;大友秀明;大友 秀明;Kazumi YAMADA;山田一美;山田一美;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA;山田一美;山田一美;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA
• 通讯作者: Kazumi YAMADA

Some Aspects of Workshop Activity on Formative Program Development : In Case of Musashino Art University' s Practical Study

形成性课程开发研讨会活动的若干方面——以武藏野美术大学的实践研究为例

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 2006 Fall International Design Conference, Proceedings, The Korean Society of Design Culture. No. 3
• 作者: Hideaki OTOMO;et. al.;大友秀明(他);Hideaki OTOMO;宮澤 好春・大友 秀明・桐谷 正信;大友秀明;大友秀明;大友 秀明;Kazumi YAMADA;山田一美;山田一美;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA;山田一美;山田一美;Kazumi YAMADA
• 通讯作者: Kazumi YAMADA

What ability of child have we been evaluating in art education?

我们在艺术教育中一直在评估孩子的哪些能力？

• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: Futabatosha : Tokyo
• 作者: Hideaki OTOMO;et. al.;大友秀明(他);Hideaki OTOMO;宮澤 好春・大友 秀明・桐谷 正信;大友秀明;大友秀明;大友 秀明;Kazumi YAMADA;山田一美;山田一美;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA
• 通讯作者: Kazumi YAMADA

「こどもワークショップ」のプログラム形成をめぐる当事者間のやりとりと課題

“儿童工坊”项目制定过程中各方的互动和问题

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 平成17年度東京学芸大学重点研究費研究成果報告書 「大学・学校現場・社会教育施設間の連携課題に関する包括的検討と検証実践」
• 作者: Hideaki OTOMO;et. al.;大友秀明(他);Hideaki OTOMO;宮澤 好春・大友 秀明・桐谷 正信;大友秀明;大友秀明;大友 秀明;Kazumi YAMADA;山田一美;山田一美;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA;Kazumi YAMADA;山田一美;山田一美
• 通讯作者: 山田一美

A Study on Transition and Characteristics of Evaluation Factors for "Arts and Handicrafts" and "Fine arts" Education after WWII : The Field of 'Craft Production' and National Art Curricula in the Late 1960's.

二战后“工艺美术”与“美术”教育评价因素的变迁与特征研究：20世纪60年代后期的“工艺生产”领域与国家美术课程。

• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: 2007 Winter International Design Conference, Proceedings, The Korean Society of Design Culture : Mumbai University, India.
• 作者: Hideaki OTOMO;et. al.;大友秀明(他);Hideaki OTOMO;宮澤 好春・大友 秀明・桐谷 正信;大友秀明;大友秀明;大友 秀明;Kazumi YAMADA
• 通讯作者: Kazumi YAMADA